For me, one of the most enduring
features of the Christmas story is the idea of a God in child form. The
innocence and helplessness of a baby is affecting at the best of times. If that
baby embodies a redemptive, yet all powerful God, the story gains a beautiful
irony. I have often wondered, why the Christian religion, being, like all
religions, rich in colour and stories, we focus so much on this part, on the
birth, the beginning. Is it that we never get past it, we are so busy trying to
get our minds around this part that we cannot begin to comprehend the rest, especially
when it ends so tragically, so bloodily and yet so triumphantly? Or is it that
this part of the story, with its symbolic offerings, Gold for a King,
Frankincense for suffering, Myrrh for death, actually embodies, somehow, all of
the rest? And then there is that haunting phrase. ‘Mary saw these things. And
pondered them in her heart.’ What dark forebodings did she have? What a
terrible and wonderful mixture of emotions. What awe and wonder.
And if you believe it’s just a
story, with no truth in it, but a clever and deep analogy, it still works. If
you are doggedly against the whole thing, and focus only on Santa Claus and
Christmas Trees, is the whole festival not about life and love? About children
and innocence? About Good and Evil? At the very least, tis the season to be
jolly. And that’s quite something.
Looking at our very own cat
nativity this Christmas, I feel the power of children. There is something
indescribably touching about the four, furry forms which suckle, squeaking, at
their Mother’s breast on Christmas Day. They are helpless, and in fact a little
dull. All they can do is suckle and sleep. They cannot even manage a meow yet,
and their eyes are not quite open. They are utterly dependent on Favourite Cat,
and in fact it is she, that Mother love which is most fascinating. When I sneak
a peek every so often, (all too often according to M) into our cupboard,
allowing my eyes to adjust to the darkness, it is her that I look at. The way
she cleans her babies, her protective paw over them, her stretched out
abandonment as they climb roughly about over her, seeking her teats. Her brief
periods of respite, when she leaves them, exhausted, to venture out for some
food. Her watchful gaze as we approach the cupboard and even more touchingly,
how her body and her eyes relax as she recognises us, submitting to a stroke on
the head, purring mightily.
After discovering her yesterday,
I ran to the shop to buy food, knowing that a suckling cat will be ravenously
hungry. We supply her with food and water, and, with a twinge of guilt, I head
out again to seek, not S, whose house it is, and in whose house we seem to have
started to feed stray cats, but B, whose love for her own rescued kittens is so
strong, bordering, rather like mine, on the obsessive. B and Boris come over to
have a look and Boris, who knows a lot about cats, tells us that the kittens
are not new born. They are about a week or two old. She must, he says, have had
them outside and then brought them in here because she felt they would be safe
here.
We are hugely honoured and deeply
touched. But we are not stupid. The gift Favourite Cat has given us, of
bringing her family in to our home for Christmas, has a bitter edge to it. We
can’t let them stay because we don’t actually live here. And we can’t take a
cat family of five, including young kittens, around the world with us. It
wouldn’t be fair, isn’t allowed (you can take only two animals per person on a
flight), and would do the cats much more harm than good.
Boris, being Thai, and basically
the knowledge imparter in this situation, (B and I are reduced to melting pools
– I especially am so excited, so touched and so moved by this addition to our
temporary home, I am unable to do much more than goo. Literally.) manages to speak to our next door neighbour.
There is an excited conversation
in Thai. Boris turns to us.
“She put a collar on her,” he
says, “because she thought it looked nice. But she’s not her cat.”
“So she isn’t owned?” I say
wonderingly, and disappointedly. Cats for Christmas is lovely for us, but I
want them to have a more permanent safe house.
“No,” says Boris, though he
frowns as he says it, “but she looks much too well cared for to be a stray.”
The question, hanging in the air,
but as yet unvoiced, is whether in fact Favourite Cat was once owned by our
Thai neighbours, but abandoned when she became pregnant.
That was yesterday. We chose not
to think about it for today, because it’s Christmas. But it’s difficult to look
after a cat who you know you will ultimately have to abandon, who you know you
will ultimately have to loose. Are you doing the cat a disservice? Or a favour?
Either way, right now, the
kittens should not be moved. So we feed Favourite Cat, and we supply her a
stable.
Which is rather stretching the
anology. But still. Is it blasphemous, I wonder, to draw analogies between a
cat family and the nativity?
I don’t know. But it’s a little
difficult not to.
As we might be the only people in
the village who are marking this day, (neither Buddhists, Sea Gypsies or
Muslims celebrate it), somehow our home, with its cat family seeking refuge,
and its carefully planned Christmas meals using Thai ingredients and a tiny
oven which we have to check underneath for Lazurus the lizard before we turn
on, feels, for today, like it somehow contains Christmas. We have made a
Christmas decoration, out of a candle from Jin’s shop, and some shells from the
beach, and arranged it on the table. M and I have swapped ‘cards’ though these
are not so easy to get hold of in Thailand. Mine is a notebook, in which M has written
a carefully worded message and an endorsement to use the notebook to record
nice things. Compliments, triumphs, etc.
“You haven’t only discovered bad
things on this journey”, is a summary of his sentiment, “try to remember the
good.”
It is certainly more natural to
remember, and to beat yourself with, the bad things you’ve done. The failures,
the disappointments. It takes more effort to do the same thing with the
positives. Why, I wonder. Or is it just me?
M’s card is actually a card,
though emblazoned with a colourful picture of an elephant. So not especially
Christmassy. It contains a long message in which I thank him for journeying
with me, for not abandoning me half way through, for his wisdom and his patience.
We do not swap presents. We have
decided that for each of us, it is the traditional, carefully worded, heart
felt message we write in our cards, which is the thing we most value.
And is the most easily
transported. If you happen to be travelling around the world.
And so, we celebrate Christmas.
We have a cat family in the cupboard, an enormous amount of food, and a
Christmas film.
We are, for the moment, perfectly
happy. But that perfect happiness is made, oddly, the more perfect for not
being. The cats, like the baby Jesus, are a mixed celebration. They are, as for
Mary, so bitter, and so sweet. Christmas itself, without our families, though
with each other, has its own edge of sadness, and our skype conversations,
though short snippets, riddled with internet unpredictability and with all the
joys and sorrows of family life, all those absent, and all those who miss them,
all those suffering, and all those who love them, are all the sweeter for their
sharper edges.
We go to bed in a whirl of love.
For the people who weren’t here with us, and the people who were. For the
opportunities we have, and for each other.
Downstairs, a cat stretches out
with her kittens. She licks them busily, falls asleep curled around them. She
does not know what their future holds. But perhaps, for now, it doesn’t matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment